.RU
Карта сайта

3. Egyesьlt Kirбlysбg - Az etika az erkцlcsi kйrdйsek filozуfiai tanulmбnyozбsa. A mйdiбval kapcsolatban a legfontosabb...

3. Egyesьlt Kirбlysбg



Aldred (1909). R. v Aldred, 22 Cox C. C. 1.

Crossman Diaries (1976). Att. Gen. v Jonathan Cape Ltd. QB 752.

Derbyshire (1992). Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers, 4 All ER 795.

Elton John (1996). Elton John v Mirror Group Newspapers, QB 586.

Gleaves (1980). Gleaves v Deakin, AC 477.

Hubbard (1976). Hubbard v Pitt, 1 QB 142.

Jones (1999). DPP v Jones, 2 All ER 257.

Jordan (1963). Jordan v Burgoyne, 2 QB 744 (DC).

O’Moran (1975). O’Moran v DPP, QB 864.

Reynolds (1999). Reynolds v Sunday Times, 3 WLR 1010.

Wheeler (1985). Wheeler v Leicester City Council, AC 1054, HL.

4. Eurуpai Uniу



Handyside (1976). Handyside v UK; Series A, no.24, 1 EHRR 737.

Lingens (1986). Lingens v Austria, 8 EHRR 407.

Sunday Times (1979). 2 EHRR 245.

5. India



Resogopal (1994). Resogopal v State of Tamil Nadu, JT 1994 6 (SC) 524.

6. Magyarorszбg



36/1994. (VI. 24.) AB hatбrozat, ABH 1994, 219. (Hatуsбg megsйrtйse-ьgy)

14/2000. (V. 12.) AB hatбrozat, ABH 2000, 83. (Цnkйnyuralmi jelkйp-ьgy)

CPg (1984). Нtйlet Benk? Zoltбn йs tбrsai ьgyйben. Beszйl?, 10.

7. Nйmetorszбg



Bцll (1980). 54 BVerfGE 208.

Brokdorf (1985). 69 BVerfGE 315.

Els? televнziуs eset (1961). 12BVerfGE 205.

Harmadik televнziуs eset (1981). 57BVerfGE 295.

Luth (1958). 7BVerfGE 198.

Mбsodik televнziуs eset (1971). 31BVerfGE 314.

Mephisto (1971). 30BVerfGE 173.

Spiegel (1966). 20BVerfGE 162.

19. fejezet - Irodalom



Adler, Renata: Reckless Disregard. New York, 1986.

Admur, Robert: Scanlon on Freedom of Expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1980.

Aman Jr., Alfred C.: Information, Privacy, and Technology: Citizens, Clients, or Consumers? In: Beatson 2000.

Anderson, David: Libel and Press Self-Censorship. Texas Law Review, 1975.

Anderson, David: The Origins of the Press Clause. University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 1983.

Anderson, David: Reputation, Compensation and Proof. William and Mary Law Review, 1984.

Anderson, David: Is Libel Worth Reforming? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1991.

n

Bagdikian, Ben: The Media Monopoly. Boston. 1983.

Bagehot, Walter: The Works and Life of Walter Bagehot. Ed. Mrs. Russell Barrington. I-X. London, 1915.

Baker, C. Edwin: Commercial Speech: A Problem in the Theory of Freedom. Iowa Law Review, 1976.

Baker, C. Edwin: Scope of the First Amendment lFreedom of Speechl. University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 1978.

Baker, C. Edwin: Unreasoned Reasonableness: Mandatory Parade Permits and lTime, Place, Mannerl Regulations. Northwestern University Law Review, 1983.

Baker, C. Edwin: Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. New York, 1989.

Baker, C. Edwin: Advertising and a Democratic Press. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1992.

Barendt, Eric: Freedom of Speech. Oxford, 1987.

Barendt, Eric: Press and Broadcasting Freedom: Does Anyone Have any Rights to Free Speech? Inaugural Lecture, The University of London. London, 1991.

Barendt, Eric: Libel and Freedom of Speech in English Law. Public Law, 1993.

Barendt, Eric: Freedom of Speech in an Era of Mass Communication. In: Birks 1995.

Barendt, Eric: Access to the Media in Western Europe. In: Sajу 1996.

Barendt, Eric et al.: Libel and the Media– The Chilling Effect. Oxford, 1997.

Barendt, Eric: The First Amendment and the Media. In: Loveland 1998.

Barendt, Eric and Hitchens, Lesley: Media Law. Essex, 2000.

Barendt, Eric (ed.): Privacy. Burlington, 2001.

Barry, Brian: Political Argument. London, 1990.

Beatson, Jack and Yvonne Cripps (eds.): Freedom of expression and freedom of information. Oxford, 2000.

Beloff, Michael J.: Politicians and the Press. In: Beatson 2000.

Bence Gyцrgy: Cenzъrбzott йs alternatнv kцzlйsi lehet?sйgek a magyar kultъrбban. Hнrmondу, 1985.

Bence Gyцrgy: A vallбsi semlegessйg hatбrairуl. Vilбgossбg, 1994.

Bentham, Jeremy: Anarchical fallacies. John Bowring (ed.): The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Edinburgh, 1843.

Berger, Vincent: Az Emberi Jogok Eurуpai Bнrуsбgбnak joggyakorlata. Budapest, 1999.

Berlin, Isaiah: Nйgy esszй a szabadsбgrуl. Budapest, 1990.

BeVier, Lilien: Money and Politics: A Perspective on the First Amendment and Campaign Finance Reform. California Law Review, 1985.

BeVier, Lillian: Campaign Finance Reform: Specious Arguments, Intractable Dilemmas. Columbia Law Review, 1994.

BeVier, Lillian: The Invisible Hand of the Marketplace of Ideas. In: Bollinger 2002.

Bezancon, R. P. and Ingle, Kathryn L.: Plato’s Cave Revisited: The Epistemology of Perception in Contemporary Defamation Law. Dickinson Law Review, 1986.

Bezancon, R. P. and Cranberg, Gilbert: Libel Law and the Press: Myth and Reality. Free Press, 1987.

Bezancon, R. P.: The Libel Tort Today. Washington and Lee Law Review, 1988.

Bezancon, R. P. et al: The Economics of Libel. In: Dennis 1989.

Bezancon, R. P. and Murchison, Brian C.: The Three Voices of Libel. Washington and Lee Law Review, 1990.

Bezancon, R. P.: Speech Stories – How Free Can Speech Be? New York, 1998.

Bezancon, R. P.: The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890–1990. In: Barendt 2001.

Bickel, Alfred: The Morality of Consent. New Haven, 1975.

Bihari Mihбly: Sajtуszabadsбg йs szocialista demokrбcia. In: Politikai rendszer йs demokrбcia. Budapest, 1985.

Birks, P. (ed.): Pressing Problems in the Law. Volume I: Criminal Justice and Human Rights. Oxford, 1995.

Black, J. and Barney, R. (eds.): Exploring questions of media morality: A special issue of the Journal of Mass Media Ethics. Mahwah, N. J., 1995.

Blackstone, William: Commentaries on the Laws of England. 16. kiadбs. London, 1825.

Blasi, Vincent: Prior Restraints in Demonstrations. Michigan Law Review, 1970.

Blasi, Vincent: The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory. American Bar Assotiation Foundation Research Journal, 1977.

Blasi, Vincent: Toward a Theory of Prior Restraint: The Central Linkage. Minnesota Law Review, 1981.

Blasi, Vincent: The Pathological Perspective and the First Amendment. Columbia Law Review, 1985.

Blasi, Vincent: Free Speech and Good Character: From Milton to Brandeis to the Present. In: Bollinger 2002.

Bok, Sisella: A hazugsбgrуl. Budapest, 1983.

Bollinger, Lee C.: Freedom of the Press and Public Access: Toward a Theory of Partial Regulation of the Mass Media. Michigan Law Review, 1976.

Bollinger, Lee C.: The Tolerant Society: Freedom of Speech and Extremist Speech in America. New York, 1986.

Bollinger, Lee C.–Stone, Geoffrey R.: Eternally Vigilant: Free Speech in the Modern Era. Chicago, 2002.

Bork, Robert: Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems. Indiana Law Journal, 1971.

Bosanquet, Bernard: Philosophical Theory of the State. New York, 1920.

Bosmajian, Haig: Dissent, Symbolic Behavior and Rhetorical Strategies. Boston, 1972.

Bosmajian, Haig: Censorship, Libraries, and the Law. New York, 1983.

Bozуki Andrбs–Sьkцsd Miklуs (szerk.): Anarchizmus. Budapest, 1991.

Brennan, William, Jr.: The Supreme Court and the Meiklejohn Interpretation of the First Amendment. Harvard Law Review, 1965.

Brenner, Daniel L. and Rivers, H. W. L. (eds.): Free, But Regulated. Ames, Iowa, 1982.

Buda Bйla: Tцbb, mint kukkolбs. Mйdiakutatу, 2002.

Byford, Katrin Schatz: Privacy in Cyberspace: Constructing a Model of Privacy for the Electronic Communications Environment. In: Barendt 2001.

n

Campaign Financing of National Elections in Foreign Countries. Washington, 1991.

Carter, Barton–Marc A. Franklin–Jay B. Wright: The First Amendment and the Fourth Estate: The Law of Mass Media. New York, 1988.

Chafee, Zechariah: Free Speech in the United States. Cambridge, Mass., 1941.

Chafee, Zechariah: Government and Mass Communications. Chicago, 1947.

Christians, C. G.: Fifty years of scholarship in media ethics. Journal of Communication, 1977.

Christians, C. G., Fackler, M., and Rotzoll, K. B. : Media ethics: Cases and moral reasoning. 5th ed. New York, 1998.

Collins, Matthew: The Law of Defamation and the Internet. Oxford, 2002.

Comment: First Amendment Protection for Commercial Advertising: The New Constitutional Doctrine. University of Chicago Law Review, 1976.

Cox, Archibald: Constitutional Issues in the Regulation of the Financing of Election Campaigns. Cleveland State Law Review. 1982.

Cranston, Maurice: Freedom: A New Analysis. London, 1953.

Curzon, L.B.: A Dictionary of Law. Estover, 1983.

n

Daniels, Norman: Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty. In: Daniels 1985.

Daniels, Norman (ed.): Reading Rawls. Oxford, 1985.

Day, L. A.: Ethics in media communication: Cases and controversies. 2nd ed. Belmont, 1997.

Deбk Ferenc: Vбlogatott Munkбi. I.kцtet. Budapest, й. n., 1906.

Dennis, E. E. and Noam, E. M. (eds.): The Cost of Libel: Economic and Policy Implications. London, 1989.

Devlin, Patrick: The Enforcement of Morals. London, 1965.

Dewey, John: The Public and Its Problems. London, 1927.

Dicey, A. : Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London, 1964.

Douglas, R. Bruce, Mara, Gerald, and Richardson, Henry (eds.): Liberalism and the Good. New York, 1990.

Downs, Donald A.: Nazis in Skokie. Notre Dame, Ind., 1985.

Dworkin, Andrea: Men Possessing Women. London, 1981.

Dworkin, Gerald: Paternalism. In: Wasserstrom 1971.

Dworkin, Ronald M.: Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, 1977.

Dworkin, Ronald M.: Is There a Right to Pornography? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1981. Magyarul, a szerz? бltal бtdolgozott vбltozatban: A jogok mint aduk. In: Krokovay 2003e.

Dworkin, Ronald M. (ed.): The Philosophy of Law. Oxford, 1977.

Dworkin, Ronald M.: A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass., 1985.

Dworkin, Ronald M.: Liberalizmus. In: Ludassy 1992a.

Dworkin, Ronald M.: The Coming Battles over Free Speech. New York Review of Books, 1992. jъnius 11. (1992b)

Dworkin, Ronald M.: Vegyьk komolyan a jogokat! In: Huoranszki 1998.

n

Elliott, D. (ed.): Responsible journalism. Beverly Hills, 1986.

Emerson, Thomas: The Doctrine of Prior Restraint. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1955.

Emerson, Thomas: Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment. New York, 1963.

Emerson, Thomas: The System of Freedom of Expression. New York, 1970.

Emerson: The Right of Privacy and Freedom of the Press. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 1979.

Epstein, Richard: Was New York Times v Sullivan Wrong? University of Chicago Law Review, 1986.

n

Farber, D. A.: Commercial Speech and First Amendment Theory. Northwestern University Law Review, 1979.

Federalist. Alexander Hamilton–James Madison–John Jay: The Federalist Papers. New York, 1961. Magyarul: Fцderalista йrtekezйsek az amerikai alkotmбnyrуl. Budapest, 1998.

Feinberg, Joel: Duties, Rights, and Claims. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1966.

Feinberg, Joel: Legal Paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1971.

Feinberg, Joel: Limits to the Freedom of Expression of Opinion. In: J. Feinberg–H. Gross (eds.): Philosophy of Law. 2. ed. Belmont, Ca., 1975.

Feinberg, Joel: Pornography and the Criminal Law. University of Pittsbugh Law Review, 1979.

Feinberg, Joel: Rights, Justice, and the Bonds of Liberty – Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton, N.J., 1980.

Feinberg, Joel: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Volumes I–IV. (I. Harm to Others; II. Offense to Others; III. Harm to Self; IV. Moral Wrong-Doing and Harmless Immoralities.) New York, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1988.

Feinberg, Joel: Tбrsadalomfilozуfia. Budapest, 1999.

Fekete Sбndor: A sajtу йs szabadsбga. Jel-Kйp, 1982.

Feldman, David: Content Neutrality. In: Loveland 1998.

Feyerabend, Paul: Against Method – Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London, 1978. Magyarul: A mуdszer ellen. Budapest, 2002.

Feyerabend, Paul: Science in a Free Society. London, 1982.

Fink, C. C.: Media ethics. Boston, 1995.

Fletcher, George P.: Thinking Torts: Private Remedies for the Defamation of Political Leaders. In: Kretzmer 2000.

Forer, Lois G.: A Chilling Effect – The Mounting Threat of Libel and Invasion of privacy Actions to the First Amendment. New York, 1987.

Forsyth, Christopher: The Proection of Political Discourse: Pragmatism or Incoherence? In: Beatson 2000.

Franklin, Marc A.: Good Names and Bad Law: A Critique of Libel Law and a Proposal. University of San Francisco Law Review, 1983.

Franklin, Marc A. and Bussel, Daniel J.: The Plantiff’s Burden in Defamation: Awareness and Falsity. William and Mary Law Review, 1984.

Franklin, Marc A.: A Declaratory Judgment Alternative to Current Libel Law. California Law Review, 1986.

Freeman, Samuel: The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge, 2003.

n

Gatley on Libel and Slander. 9th edn. Sweet a Maxwell, 1998.

Geyh, C. G.: The Regulation of Speech Incident to the Sale or Promotion of Goods and Services: A Multifactor Approach. University of Pittsburg Law Review, 1990.

Gibbons, Thomas: Defamation Reconsidered. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1996.

Gillmor, D. M.: Power, Publicity and the Abuse of Libel Law. Oxford, 1992.

Gillmor, D. M.: A look at media ethics. Media Ethics, 1993.

Gintis, Herbert: Towards a Political Economy of Education: A Radical Critique of Ivan Illich’s De-Schooling Society. Harvard Educational Review, 1972.

Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, 1959. Magyarul: Az йn bemutatбsa a mindennapi йletben. Budapest, 2000.

Goldberger, David: A Reconsideration of Cox v New Hampshire: Can Demonstrators be Required to Pay the Costs of Using America’s Public Forums.
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • Контрольная работа
  • © sanaalar.ru
    Образовательные документы для студентов.